<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Christian Historian as Christian or Scientist? Bradley and Muller on Historical Method</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saet-online.org/bradley-and-mueller-on-historical-method/09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saet-online.org/bradley-and-mueller-on-historical-method/09/</link>
	<description>The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesial Theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SAET &#187; Who Cares What Calvin Thought? (The Church, That&#8217;s Who) &#187; The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesial Theology</title>
		<link>http://www.saet-online.org/bradley-and-mueller-on-historical-method/09/comment-page-1/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>SAET &#187; Who Cares What Calvin Thought? (The Church, That&#8217;s Who) &#187; The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesial Theology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saet-online.org/?p=827#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>[...] their comments earlier in the book, Bradley and Muller acknowledge the difficulty of achieving total objectivity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their comments earlier in the book, Bradley and Muller acknowledge the difficulty of achieving total objectivity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.saet-online.org/bradley-and-mueller-on-historical-method/09/comment-page-1/#comment-1733</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saet-online.org/?p=827#comment-1733</guid>
		<description>Gerald,

Thank you for this.  I think you&#039;re spot on in both your appreciation for Bradley and Muller, and in your criticisms of their method.  It&#039;s all the more strange because iirc, Muller, at least, would claim to be a presuppositionalist.  A big &#039;Amen&#039; to careful, historically located readings and awareness of our own bias, but a big &#039;boo&#039; to the goose of &#039;neutrality&#039;.  As you say, even were it possible, for a Christian thinker, and especially for a pastor, it would be deeply undesirable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerald,</p>
<p>Thank you for this.  I think you&#8217;re spot on in both your appreciation for Bradley and Muller, and in your criticisms of their method.  It&#8217;s all the more strange because iirc, Muller, at least, would claim to be a presuppositionalist.  A big &#8216;Amen&#8217; to careful, historically located readings and awareness of our own bias, but a big &#8216;boo&#8217; to the goose of &#8216;neutrality&#8217;.  As you say, even were it possible, for a Christian thinker, and especially for a pastor, it would be deeply undesirable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
                                                                                                                        