The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesiological Theology

  • Home
  • About
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Director Interview
  • SAET Fellowships
    • First Fellowship
    • Second Fellowship
    • Fellowship Symposia
    • Apply to a SAET Fellowship
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • November 30, 2009 by Gerald Hiestand

    Taxonomy of the Pastor-Theologian, Part 5: The Pastor-Theologian as Ecclesial Theologian

    saet-taxonomyHaving discussed the reigning models of the pastor-theologian (local, popular, academic), the SAET’s vision for the pastor-theologian begins to emerge—the pastor-theologian as ecclesial theologian.

    The pastor-as-ecclesial-theologian marks a new path. The ecclesial theologian is as church centered as the local and popular theologian models, and is as intellectually rigorous as the academic theologian model. The ecclesial theologian is a pastor who writes robust, biblical, ecclesially centered, theological reflection to other theologians. It includes, but pushes beyond, the local theologian and popular theologian models, prosecuting a theological agenda consistent with ecclesial theology.

    Luther’s Galatians commentary comes to mind here. Luther’s work is quite a bit different than your average modern academic commentary. It’s different in that it doesn’t feel such a need to plumb the nearly endless depths of secondary literature (there wasn’t as much), because it’s not afraid to be explicitly theological and confessional, because it interacts with the great thinkers of the past who have helped shape orthodox thought, and—most significantly—because it prophetically calls the church to take action. But it’s not different because it’s “lighter” or “easier to read” or “pitched to a less informed audience.” Luther did not change the world because he was a successful academician (though he was). Nor did he change the world by writing merely popular tracts (though he did). He changed the world because he wrote as a robust, theologically informed, intelligent, prophetic ecclesial theologian.

    The ecclesial theologian counters the sentiment that says, “Deep, penetrating commentaries and books on the atonement—that stuff is for the academy. Pastors should stick to writing pop theology and Christian living stuff.” God forbid! Expounding God’s Word and reflecting on the nature of the atonement, etc., needs to be brought back into the domain of the church. The ecclesial theologian represents a return to the days when pastors wrote theology that was richly theological, deeply biblical, historically informed, culturally aware, prophetic, and intelligent.

    Not every pastor is called to be an ecclesial theologian. But many pastors today—particularly among the younger generation—feel pulled between the life of the mind and the life of the church. They love study, writing, reflection, and theology. But at the same time they have a deep heart and calling for pastoral ministry in the local church. Our current context compels such people to choose between these two callings. Yet this need not be—history has proven otherwise! Evangelical theology is crying out for individuals who are willing to unite the life of the mind (and pen) and the mission of the church.

    More work remains to be done. Perhaps the next great challenge will be overcoming the institutional hurdles of local church ministry. The local church, in its present form, is rarely an incubator for birthing ecclesial theologians. But such change will take time. For now, those of us committed to charting the uncharted territory of ecclesial theology must content ourselves with working in a system—as best we can—that does not always lend itself to the project we are pursuing. Our pioneering generation may not reap the full benefit of our efforts. But I’m convinced that our work now is laying the ground work for a return of the ecclesial theologian, for the renewal of the church.

    Categories: Ecclesial Theology | Pastor-theologian

    Recent Comments

    • Ed Eubanks said...

      Perhaps the next great challenge will be overcoming the institutional hurdles of local church ministry. The local church, in its present form, is rarely an incubator for birthing ecclesial theologians.

      This is where I would put forth a presbyterian model of church governance and leadership as ideal. (I’m not saying that all churches should BE Presbyterians by denominational affiliation, but that the form of leadership offers much to be desired.)

      In a well-functioning presbyterian government, the Ruling Elders and Deacons are a strong support to the Pastor in shepherding, visitation, and even teaching– allowing him more dedicated time to study, prayer, writing. I would imagine that most Sessions don’t have in mind that their Pastor will spend much of his time in serious writing, but that may be because their Pastor has never articulated a vision for how this is both a fulfillment of his calling and a ministry of benefit to the congregation and greater church.

      In my situation (the Pastor of a smaller congregation) my Session is very supportive of my writing and broader-church ministry, because they understand how they are participants in something greater than merely the local gathering of the saints.

      12/3/09 3:52 PM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

Welcome

doorWelcome to saet-online.org, the online home of The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesial Theology (SAET). The SAET is an organization dedicated to assisting pastor-theologians in producing biblical and theological scholarship for the renewal of orthodox theology, for the renewal of the church. Operating within the historic evangelical tradition, the SAET believes the contemporary bifurcation between the pastoral calling and theological formation has resulted in the loss of a distinctly ecclesial voice in orthodox theology. The SAET seeks to resurrect this voice...(continue reading)

SAET Bloggers

  • Bryan Loritts
  • David Rudolph (IM)
  • David Rudolph (JAB)
  • Eric Bargerhuff
  • Gerald Hiestand
  • Jason Hood
  • Jay Thomas
  • Joel Willitts
  • Matthew Mason
  • Owen Strachan
  • Stephen Witmer
  • Todd Wilson

Recent Posts

  • David Rudolph on “Paul’s Rule in All the Churches”
  • Stephen Witmer on Sin
  • Eternity Bible College Now Offering Online Classes
  • Ecclesial Theology and SBL
  • Pastor-Theologians and Academic Theologians: Toward a Healthy Division of Labor, Part 3
  • Ecclesial Theology as the Foundation of Popular Theology
  • Spring Gathering of the Second Fellowship
  • Piper on PhD’s
  • Matt Kim, New SAET Fellow
  • Dr. Jeff Hubing, New SAET Fellow

Article Categories

  • Academic Theology (12)
  • Anglican (1)
  • Articles (1)
  • Book Review (6)
  • Carl Trueman (1)
  • Church (2)
  • Church History (1)
  • Commentaries (1)
  • Conference (1)
  • David Rudolph (1)
  • Ecclesial Theologian (4)
  • Ecclesial Theology (29)
  • Ecumenism (1)
  • Eric Bargerhuff (1)
  • Evangelicalism (2)
  • First Fellowship (2)
  • George Marsden (1)
  • Historical Method (1)
  • Jeff Hubing (1)
  • Joel Lawrence (1)
  • John Piper (3)
  • John Webster (2)
  • Jonathan Edwards (1)
  • Kevin Vanhoozer (2)
  • Martin Hengel (1)
  • Matt Kim (1)
  • Pastor Ministry (1)
  • Pastor-theologian (22)
  • Popular Theology (2)
  • Preston Sprinkle (2)
  • Resurrection (3)
  • Robert Jenson (2)
  • SAET Fellow Publications (5)
  • SAET Fellowship (6)
  • SBL (1)
  • Second Fellowship (4)
  • Soteriology (1)
  • Stephen Witmer (1)
  • Symposium (4)
  • Systematic Theology (2)
  • The SAET (4)
  • Theology (2)
  • Tom Wright (4)
  • Uncategorized (7)
  • Wider Theologians (3)

Copyright 2010 The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesial Theology | Website Design by 343design | Admin