The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesiological Theology

  • Home
  • About
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Director Interview
  • SAET Fellowships
    • First SAET Fellowship
    • Second SAET Fellowship
    • Fellowship Symposia
    • Apply to a SAET Fellowship
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • November 9, 2009 by Gerald Hiestand

    Doug Sweeny On the Professor as Researcher and the Pastor as Theologian

    sweeneyAt the close of the ‘09 SAET Symposium, our Senior Theological Consultant, Doug Sweeney, offered the following proposal regarding the future relationship between academic scholars and pastor-theologians:

    “We will not always need academic, systematic theologians to do all the heavy theological lifting for God’s people. We are not often explicit about this, but systematic theology, insofar as it is distinguished from biblical, historical, philosophical, psychological, and intercultural theology, is the work of generalists, people who synthesize the findings of those in the other scholarly disciplines and neither have nor require a methodology of their own. They put the big picture together and apply it to our lives. They don’t require the resources or the structures of the academy to do this kind of work (though they do need very good libraries). In fact, the people best suited to synthesize our knowledge of God and His ways in the world, applying this knowledge to the empirical realities people face, are pastor-theologians.

    We should work toward a day when professors view themselves as handmaids serving pastor-theologians, and pastor-theologians play an important public role in guiding people theologically. Professors should continue to offer specialized instruction in ancient languages and history, exegesis, church history, social science, and philosophy. They will continue to raise up future generations of pastors. But we should work to raise up the kinds of pastors who can synthesize, exposit, and apply the knowledge of God to the lives of all God’s people with authority.”

    In sum, professors in the academy should continue to focus on primary-level research, but theological reflection and synthesis should be moved back into the churches. Doug’s way of parsing this out was extremely helpful in reminding me of the need for church and academy to lock arms. Given the rise of the modern research university, as well as the development of the specialized theological guilds, it is no longer realistic to expect one person to be both a cutting edge research scholar and a robust systematic theologian. The fields have simply become too specialized and the secondary literature too vast.

    Given our current context, the professor is best positioned to engage in primary-level research. Pastors—in the main—simply cannot afford the time away from their parishes to do the sort of work the modern research professor does (visiting research libraries, study centers, etc.). And if the professor is uniquely positioned to engage in primary research, the pastor is just as uniquely positioned to engage in theological analysis. Who better to write ecclesially sensitive theology than pastor-theologians?

    Doug’s willingness to refer to himself and other academics as “handmaids” is remarkably charitable, and no doubt a word for those in the academy. But for my part, I had lost sight of the fact that pastor-theologians were in need of such handmaids. But we no longer live in a pre-critical context, and thus the pastor-theologian can no longer go it alone. The days of Calvin, Luther and Edwards are gone; the modern research university is here to stay. Pastor-theologians need believing research professors who ably hand them the raw data necessary for theological reflection. And believing professors need pastors who can ably synthesize the data they mine, for the good of the church.

    The current division of labor between the academy and the church is, ”Professors will do the thinking, pastors will do the praxis.” But if we follow Doug’s advice, it should become, “Professors will do the research, pastors will do the theology.” Of course, it’s not a zero-sum game. No doubt pastor-theologians can (and will) do primary-level research. And certainly professors will continue to make helpful theological contributions. But in the main, Doug’s suggestion makes the best use of our respective social locations.

    Categories: Academic Theology | Ecclesial Theology | Pastor-theologian | Symposium

    Recent Comments

    • SAET » Pastor-Theologians and Academic Theologians: A Few Thoughts in Light of Jenson’s Systematic Theology » The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesial Theology said...

      [...] to orthodox/evangelical theology that is not already being done by academic theologians? In a previous post I had argued for a division of labor between academic scholars (representing their respective [...]

      03/8/10 10:29 PM | Comment Link

    Leave A Comment

Welcome

doorWelcome to saet-online.org, the online home of The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesial Theology (SAET). The SAET is an organization dedicated to assisting pastor-theologians in producing biblical and theological scholarship for the renewal of orthodox theology, for the renewal of the church. Operating within the historic evangelical tradition, the SAET believes the contemporary bifurcation between the pastoral calling and theological formation has resulted in the loss of a distinctly ecclesial voice in orthodox theology. The SAET seeks to resurrect this voice...(continue reading)

Recent Posts

  • Dr. Joel Willitts, Newest SAET Fellow
  • Pastor-Theologians and Academic Theologians: Toward a Healthy Division of Labor
  • The Faith of Jesus Christ, Sprinkle and Bird
  • The Pastor-Theologian as Ecclesial Theologian
  • Bargerhuff, The Love that Rescues
  • Two Birds With One “Pastor-as-Ecclesial-Theologian” Stone
  • New Digs for the SAET Site
  • Biblical Evidence that Pastors Are Called to Serve as Wider Theologians: Part 2
  • Jenson on Prolegomena
  • Newly Updated Fellowship Prospectus

Article Categories

  • Academic Theology (9)
  • Anglican (1)
  • Articles (1)
  • Book Review (8)
  • Carl Trueman (1)
  • Church (2)
  • Church History (1)
  • Commentaries (1)
  • Conference (1)
  • Ecclesial Theologian (2)
  • Ecclesial Theology (26)
  • Ecumenism (1)
  • Evangelicalism (2)
  • First Fellowship (2)
  • George Marsden (1)
  • Historical Method (1)
  • John Piper (2)
  • Jonathan Edwards (1)
  • Kevin Vanhoozer (1)
  • Martin Hengel (1)
  • Pastor Ministry (1)
  • Pastor-theologian (20)
  • Resurrection (3)
  • Robert Jenson (1)
  • SAET Fellowship (6)
  • Second Fellowship (1)
  • Soteriology (1)
  • Symposium (3)
  • Systematic Theology (2)
  • The SAET (4)
  • Theology (2)
  • Tom Wright (3)
  • Uncategorized (6)
  • Wider Theologians (3)

SAET Bloggers

  • Bryan Loritts
  • David Rudolph (IM)
  • David Rudolph (JAB)
  • Eric Bargerhuff
  • Gerald Hiestand
  • Jay Thomas
  • Joel Willitts
  • Matthew Mason
  • Owen Strachan
  • Stephen Witmer
  • Todd Wilson

Copyright 2010 The Society for the Advancement of Ecclesial Theology | Website Design by 343design | Admin