-
October 18, 2009 by Gerald Hiestand
Vanhoozer’s Ten Theses and the Pastor-Theologian as Evangelicalism’s Default Public Intellectual
Michael Bird posted these ten theses from Kevin Vanhoozer’s paper entitled “Interpreting Scripture between the Rock of Biblical Studies and the Hard Place of Systematic Theology: The State of the Evangelical (Dis)union,” delivered at Gordon-Conwell for the Renewing the Evangelical Mission conference. These have been floating around the blogosphere, but they’re worth posting again here, particularly the closing observation he makes regarding pastor-theologians.
1. The nature and function of the Bible are insufficiently grasped unless and until we see the Bible as an element in the economy of triune discourse.
2. An appreciation of the theological nature of the Bible entails a rejection of a methodological atheism that treats the texts as having a “natural history” only.
3. The message of the Bible is “finally” about the loving power of God for salvation (Rom. 1:16), the definitive or final gospel Word of God that comes to brightest light in the word’s final form.
4. Because God acts in space-time (of Israel, Jesus Christ, and the church), theological interpretation requires thick descriptions that plumb the height and depth of history, not only its length.
5. Theological interpreters view the historical events recounted in Scripture as ingredients in a unified story ordered by an economy of triune providence.
6. The Old Testament testifies to the same drama of redemption as the New, hence the church rightly reads both Testaments together, two parts of a single authoritative script.
7. The Spirit who speaks with magisterial authority in the Scripture speaks with ministerial authority in church tradition.
8. In an era marked by the conflict of interpretations, there is good reason provisionally to acknowledge the superiority of catholic interpretation.
9. The end of biblical interpretation is not simply communication – the sharing of information – but communion, a sharing in the light, life, and love of God.
10. The church is that community where good habits of theological interpretation are best formed and where the fruit of these habits are best exhibited.
Vanhoozer goes on to write, “Seminary faculties need the courage to be evangelically Protestant for the sake of forming theological interpreters of Scripture able to preach and minister the word. The preacher is a “man on a wire,” whose sermons must walk the tightrope between Scripture and the contemporary situation. I believe that we should preparing our best students for this gospel ministry. The pastor-theologian, I submit, should be evangelicalism’s default public intellectual, with preaching the preferred public mode of theological interpretation of Scripture.”
Leave A Comment
Welcome to the SAET blog. Herein you will find the theological/pastoral ramblings of the Rev. Matthew Mason, the good Doctor Jason Hood, and Pastor Gerald Hiestand. All three write under the premise that theology and the pastorate belong together, and that (at least some) pastors must once again function as writing theologians for the wider church, for the ecclesial renewal of theology and the theological renewal of the church.






Recent Comments
Well this certainly is the heart and soul of where we need to be in light of the cultural/intepretive battles that are waging today. Truly Kevin captures the heart of Titus 1:1, where the faith and knowledge of God is always that which leads to godliness, the practical living of everyday Christian life. The Word of God is alive — breathing the breath of God that is not static by dynamically speaking today, with one timeless meaning and multiple, ever-changing applications. And of course we understand Vanhoozer’s use of “catholic” to mean the primary universal understanding that has been held throughout most of church history and not simply “Roman Catholic.”
His emphasis on the triune nature of revelation is especially helpful. We have far too long neglected the significance of seeing God in Triune activity and fashion not only in our theological interpretation of Scripture but even further in our understanding of church practices. For example, in the practice of church discipline, we see God’s “Fatherly discipline and love” being expressed in reconciliatory fashion within the “Spirit-filled community” who acts redemptively instead of punitively thanks to the penal substitutionary atonement achieved by the “Son.” Therefore the Trinity is intimately connected to church practice. I owe much of this insight to Dr. Vanhoozer, and his profound influence in calling the pastor-theologians of today to consider the Trinity in the “divine life we participate in” has done nothing but enrich my preaching and teaching so that I am truly communicating the “whole counsel of God.”
10/22/09 2:44 PM | Comment Link
Evangelicals Have Incredible Reasons to Engage the Life of the Mind said...
[...] because the pastor should be a kind of public intellectual, as Kevin Vanhoozer has elegantly argued here and here. Pastors are interested not only in the heart, but in the mind. In fact, pastors of all [...]
01/5/13 11:19 AM | Comment Link